Stephen Rees's blog

Thoughts about the relationships between transport and the urban area it serves

Business chiefs launch attack on parking tax

with 6 comments

Don Cayo in the Vancouver Sun has a longish opinion piece on a new campaign of opposition to the increase in parking taxes downtown. It is all very predictable – with the usual suspects lining up to vent – including Charles Gauthier, who has regularly featured on this blog.

It is perhaps a little late for the campaign. Much more effective, surely, would have been some activity while Translink was still in consultation mode. After all, regional bodies here are much more responsive to organized business interests – the truckers and the Gateway Council for instance – than they are to community groups or public opinion. What transit users think, of course, has never mattered at all.

But campaigns by groups like this have worked. After all, the leaders of these organisations also tend to be, or be close to, BC Liberal Party insiders.  As Cayo notes, an earlier, regional parking tax was killed by a similar effort. Though this one seems to be more aimed at public opinion than politicians.

Actually, the people who pay to park are not a very significant component of the region’s population. Most of the parking spaces in the region are still “free” and a lot are on private land. Most are tied to other activities – shopping or employment. Increasing parking charges ought to be one of the more effective ways of influencing driver behaviour. After all, the parking charge is applied at the end of the trip, when the trip is made. So it can be avoided only of the trip is not made or diverted elsewhere. Except, it turns out, a lot of people do not pay themselves for the space they occupy.  It get claimed on travel expenses or written off as a business expense. Some employers pay for parking as a benefit. Parking charges in Vancouver are, comparatively speaking, quite cheap. Much cheaper than  major urban centres like London or New York – and that is partly because there is still, comparatively speaking, quite a lot of it. Though perhaps now less than there was, and probably it wil become scarcer, at least in the dense downtown core and the major business districts.

I think this is just as it should be. The areas where the new rates apply are those that are best served by transit, so if there is an effect of encouraging car users to switch modes that should become apparent. It cannot happen in most of the rest of the region since transit capacity and service levels are so woefully inadequate, you have to be a “transit captive” to use it.

Translink is, of course, cash strapped becuase it does not have access to adequate operating funding from senior  governments. Not enough from the province, none at all from the feds. And the parking tax is part of a program of funding stabilization that also hits transit users and property tax payers – as well as drivers in general, since the gas tax has gone up too. Again, in a world where carbon emissions have to fall, just as it should be. Transit is well worth paying for: it is a public good which needs to be supported. Translink also pays for roads too, as it happens. So on the whole I do not see that this campaign really has much merit. Nor do they seem to be really on the ball in coming up with some alternative way of keeping this essential service going. Of course whenever taxes are increased there are howls of protest. But since governments in Canada have been doing their best to lower income taxes and cutting services in general, I think the limit to the protesters demands may well have been reached.

Written by Stephen Rees

January 7, 2010 at 4:55 pm

Posted in parking, transit

Tagged with

6 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Todd Litman just released a report including a discussion of parking tax I think:

    Click to access econ_dev.pdf


    January 7, 2010 at 6:47 pm

  2. The champions of spending far too much on transit to Richmond and YVR don’t want to have to pay for the very thing they worked so hard to push through. Poor babies, I cry huge tears over their hypocrisy.


    January 7, 2010 at 10:09 pm

  3. Sounds like a bunch of argy-bargy and chest beating just to make some people feel self-important. Perhaps they fear a precedent. They might actually have some credibility if they’d bothered to propose an alternate source of revenue to the parking tax increase.

    Chris S

    January 7, 2010 at 11:40 pm

  4. Just compare hourly rates to Toronto’s, I bet Vancouver is still cheaper. The radio newscast I heard the other day featured a construction worker who complained there’s few other options for men in construction with big trucks and ladders. I’d sympathize with him, except I keep seeing the same thing downtown; big shiny heavy duty super 4×4 pickup trucks with NOTHING IN THEM! Vanity trucks.


    January 8, 2010 at 10:20 pm

  5. One more thing of course about construction trucks with their ladders. If it is done for work, parking is a business expense that would be written off their taxes.


    January 11, 2010 at 11:15 am

  6. If Charles Gauthier, executive director of the Downtown Vancouver Business Improvement Association, dislike Parking taxes so much, why doesn’t he campaign for pedestrian shopping streets? pedestrian streets are found around the world by the thousands. Many of them are at least 30 years old, long enough to show that it works.

    Red frog

    January 12, 2010 at 1:23 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: